<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DuPont, Washington Historical Information - Save, Preserve, Educate&#187; Sequalitchew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.savethehistory.com/tag/sequalitchew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.savethehistory.com</link>
	<description>Save The History</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sequalitchew Creek&#8230;A Watershed Runneth Dry or Disappearing?</title>
		<link>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creeka-watershed-runneth-dry-or-disappearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creeka-watershed-runneth-dry-or-disappearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savethehistory.com/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DURING ONE OF MY MIDDLE SCHOOL YEARS, Steilacoom School District arranged to bus the students to the city of DuPont to learn about the vast history and upcoming development the city would soon entertain. We had the opportunity to visit the Sequalitchew Creek Bed near Edmonds Village; we were granted entry past the guard gates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creeka-watershed-runneth-dry-or-disappearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequalitchew Creek Swimming Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creek-swimming-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creek-swimming-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Swimming Hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing Houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trestle Bridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savethehistory.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a rel="attachment wp-att-1537" href="http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creek-swimming-hole/swimminghole480/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1537" title="swimminghole480" src="http://www.savethehistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/swimminghole480.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="190" /></a>

While on a hunt for the old Sequalitchew Creek swimming hole from the 1920's.  The swimming hole was constructed ca. 1920 by the DuPont Company. It was used for swimming and fishing back then and Yes, there would actually be fish in the creek. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/03/sequalitchew-creek-swimming-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Methodist Mission can it be located exactly?</title>
		<link>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/methodist-mission-can-it-be-located-exactly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/methodist-mission-can-it-be-located-exactly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodist Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nisqually]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sketch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savethehistory.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/methodist-mission-can-it-be-located-exactly/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1553" title="mission480" src="http://www.savethehistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mission480.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="272" /></a>
The Methodist Mission has a marker set by the DuPont Co in 1927 just near the burn area of the Powder Works Plant.

While surveys were done later, not enough evidence exists to say if this was really the site. In 1989 Moura and Condon performed a survey in which not much evidence was produced to say if in deed this was the site. Earlier studies and later studies all led to the same conclusion.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/methodist-mission-can-it-be-located-exactly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequalitchew Creek Flume Dam</title>
		<link>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-dam-head/</link>
		<comments>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-dam-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flume Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DuPont Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savethehistory.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

This is the Sequalitchew Creek Dam Head as it stands today. This was created by the DuPont Co. in the early 20's I believe to divert the water to the power house in the bottom part of the canyon. I have included the 1926 photo for reference. <!--more-->]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-dam-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequalitchew Creek Watershed Project</title>
		<link>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-watershed-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-watershed-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edmond marsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamer marsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequalitchew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watershed project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkdupont.org/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-watershed-project/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1550" title="indicator_480" src="http://www.savethehistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/indicator_480.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="275" /></a>

Sequalitchew Creek flows three miles from Sequalitchew Lake on Fort Lewis, through the City of DuPont, into the southern portion of Puget Sound. The watershed is small, but on the verge of rapid development as a planned community that includes residential, commercial and industrial land use.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.savethehistory.com/2009/02/sequalitchew-creek-watershed-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

